Conferences and workshops: How should I spend my time and money?

I love language teacher conferences and training. I mean, I REALLY love them. And with that love comes some critical reflection on who they serve, and hopefully some solid ideas for how to spend your very precious time and money. 

I also need to say that as someone who organizes workshops and trainings, I am totally going to reveal my biases - and give myself a shoutout when appropriate. Because it *is* my blog! 

I want to discuss the different types of acquisition- driven conferences (aka comprehension-based, comprehensible input) that I know about, their pros and cons, and give some suggestions for which kind of training / conference is best suited to you, your experience, your teaching context, and your individual needs as a teacher-learner engaging in professional development. 

I am not going to talk about world language conferences that are not specifically acquisition driven (e.g. regional conferences such as SWCOLT, state conferences, or ACTFL). I am also not going to address virtual trainings (such as The Comprehensible Classroom's Acquisition Boot Camps and Micro-Courses, or Mike Peto's CI Master Class) or ongoing professional development such as La Familia Loca PLC, Au Salon des profs, or the Growing with Proficiency Academy. I am just going to focus on workshops and conferences. 

Any errors and all opinions are my own! 

Definitions:

Workshop- usually 1-3 days, led by one speaker or organization, usually with one lead trainer who guides the learning.

Conference- 1-5 days, produced by an organization (profit or non-profit), with sessions presented by different teachers. Some conference models, especially those focused on acquisition-driven instruction, have different tracks for teachers based on their experience with acquisition-driven instruction. 

Let's break this down into more specific categories: 

The Expert-Led Workshop

Examples: Teach and Assess for Acquisition from The Comprehensible Classroom, Acquisition Academy from The Comprehensible Classroom (not offered in 2025),  In-person training from Mike Peto, Annabelle Williamson, Jan Kittok, or Bryce Hedstrom. (Some virtual trainings fall into this as well, e.g. Liam Printer's workshops.) 

This type of workshop usually has only one main speaker. (If it's Acquisition Academy, you get two main speakers!) It is often only one day (unless it is one of mine!), and it is *usually* built to meet the needs of the maximum number of people. 

There are many, many pros to this kind of workshop, especially if you are interested in experiencing learning in a sequenced, planned way with one person's overall idea of what acquisition-driven instruction looks like.  If you are new to acquisition-driven instruction, I think this might be the best use of your money because the folks who provide these workshops work really hard to make them meaningful and applicable. 

Usually there will be some kind of language experience through demonstrations (often in less commonly taught languages- Japanese, Mandarin, Russian, etc.), and maybe opportunities to practice or observe in a skills lab. 

The really adept workshop designers are able to present material that works for those who are brand new and those who have been to a ton of trainings- they create subtly differentiated content that can be accessed by a variety of experience levels. 

Another pro of this kind of workshop is that no matter how experienced you are, it is *always* helpful to review the basics of acquisition driven instruction, and be a learner in another language. Always.   

My Teach and Assess for Acquisition workshops are this kind of workshop, as is the Acquisition Academy that we run. I carefully design every moment, leave nothing to chance, and spend a lot of time thinking about how to sequence each learning experience to maximize impact and minimize overwhelm. And I usually include skills labs somewhere too, because I think they are SO important. 

Pros: 

• Sequenced learning designed with specific outcomes.
• Highly experienced presenters
• Less chance of overwhelm because the presenter is sharing one single vision / approach based on their principles of acquisition and instruction. 
• You might have the opportunity to work in small groups in a "skills lab" with an experienced coach to practice what you have learned. 
• Being a student in another language 

Cons: 

• You might think that you don't need "the basics" any more. (Tip: you might be wrong about that!) 
• One single track- experienced and brand new grouped all together. This can be frustrating if you are already knowledgable because participant questions will likely be focused on entry level ideas rather than fine tuning your practice. 
• You may or may not jive with that one person. If you don't, the training will be long. 

"Tracked" Acquisition Driven Conference

Examples: The CI Summit. Examples from history: IFLT, Fluency Matters Conference, NTPRS

This type of conference is a bit of a hybrid. It will include many elements of a an expert led workshop, such as opportunities to be a language learner in a new-to-you language, and a sequenced learning path that will be different for each level of experience. Usually, the trainers at these sessions are highly experienced. In the past, some of these conferences have also offered the opportunity to observe highly experienced teachers teaching actual kids. There is usually a keynote as well as a variety of sessions presented by many different teachers. The other really key part of this kind of conference is the Skills Lab and the coaches who work with different groups on different skills, both in their individual tracks as well as in an open Skills Lab. In my opinion, Skills Labs are where the magic really happens, and this makes these conferences really special. Plus there's usually some social activities (Karaoke, open mic, that sort of thing) to create community and connections. 

Pros: 

• Being grouped with similarly-experienced teachers is really powerful because the presenters/trainers can tailor content to different levels of understanding. Bonus: you can find like minded teachers with whom to keep learning! (See below!) 
• Skills labs and coaches: There is something about being in a skills lab- whether you participate as a teacher, student, or observer, that will have a profound effect on your teaching. Being part of the Coaching team is one of the professional achievements that I am most proud of because it is transformative for teachers.  
• Ideally, each track will have a leader who understands the experience level, the types of roadblocks that are likely to come up based on that experience, and a plan to help everyone through those blocks. 
• Usually the trainers for the different tracks are highly experienced. 
• Opportunities to be a language learner (and sometimes observer of students in a classroom). 

Cons

• Depending on your track (and the conference), the training can be sequenced and intentional, or scattered and piecemeal. It really depends on a lot of different factors.
• The sessions outside of the tracked plan can be hit or miss. Because they are all individually created, there is no overarching plan and you might hear some people say things that are the opposite of what someone else said, and that can be confusing and frustrating. 
• Mix of experienced and inexperienced presenters. 

Acquisition Driven Conference

Examples: Comprehensible Iowa, Mitten CI, Comprehensible Midwest, CI Reboot (virtual), Express Fluency's Conference in the Cloud (virtual), The Agen Workshop (France), TCI China (China)

This conference is likely to have some key features: a keynote, some well-known presenters, and lots of sessions on lots of different topics. Sessions tend to be shorter (1 hour, 90 minutes). There may be opportunities to be a language learner in a new-to-you language, and their may be skills labs for you to join in. 

Pros: 

• These are often regional, so they are easier to get to (depending on if one is in your region or not)
• You might meet people in your region with whom to keep collaborating! (See below)  
• Often lower cost.
• Variety, variety, variety! There will be a lot of different sessions on different topics! And lots of different presenters! 
• There might be skills labs (Agen) and opportunities to be language learners (also Agen!) 

Cons

• If you are new to acquisition driven instruction, it can be very overwhelming to attend lots of different sessions.
• There is no sequence of learning- so you might learn about a skill in one session, and a technique in another, and assessment in another, but not have any idea how to put it all together. 
• Mix of experienced and inexperienced presenters; sessions can be hit or miss. 
• Variety of opinions can lead to confusion and overload. 

What conference should I choose? 

Since your time and money are precious, it makes sense to be very thoughtful before committing your money (or your school's money).

Here are are some scenarios and suggestions:

• I am looking to dip my toes in to acquisition driven instruction and get a lot of different ideas and strategies. I just want some professional development to keep me from getting in a rut. 
• You might want to look at an Acquisition Driven conference that has or doesn't have tracks.

• I am new to this whole Acquisition Driven instruction thing and I really want to learn how to do it. 
• Consider a workshop to take advantage of highly experienced presenters and a sequenced series of learnings.  If none of those work for you, the next option would be a tracked conference. 

• I feel like I have the basics; I want to go further. 
• This is where a tracked conference with skills labs really shines! You can take a new language, participate in skills labs, and meet other teachers with similar levels of experience. 
• Don't discount the power of an expert-led workshop. Skilled trainers are often teaching on multiple levels, and the most experienced ADI teachers know that they can get a lot out of very beginner training (see below). 

• I am very experienced. But I still want more training.
• Tracked conferences are great if they have an experienced track or some kind of "teach the teacher" track.
• Anything that has a skills lab with coaches will be very, very good for you! (Trust me!) 
• Acquisition Driven conferences can be very good for highly experienced teachers. The variety means you can get what you want, and you probably gravitate toward presenters that you click with. One thing that worked very well for me at these conferences was to go with one theme in mind and attend sessions on that theme, e.g. assessment, reading instruction, upper levels, etc. 

Speaking of folks who are experienced and have a lot of training? 

 It is super common for people who are enthusiastic about teaching with acquisition-driven instruction to poo-poo beginner training. I know I did. I wanted the advanced stuff- badly. I talk to teachers all the time who want "advanced" training. And while I absolutely think there is a place for leveled training experiences, I have come to believe what all the most experienced ADI teacher trainers and coaches kept telling me: you can never work enough on the most basic skills, and you can't be reminded of them enough. AND...

Here's the tricky part (and one possible solution)- although I truly believe that all teachers interested in comprehension based communicative language teaching (aka acquisition driven instruction, comprehensible input) benefit from a back to basics approach, it can be extremely frustrating to be in trainings where the same questions are asked over and over again, and there are no opportunities to dive into what you really need.  

My solution for the very experienced: 

1) Go to all the trainings you can- beginner, advanced, whatever. Do not poo-poo beginner training.

2) Any time you can get into a Skills Lab with a coach...do it.  

3) Find or create a professional learning community (PLC) of teachers with similar training (hint- look for them at conferences!) and process what you learned with them, through your more experienced teacher lens. 

4) Set up a time to meet with them regularly- zoom, google meets, at the local library, etc. One year, my little PLC couldn't find a time to meet so we used the Marco Polo app to leave each other asynchronous messages. 

I hope to see you all at some upcoming conferences and workshops this year! 

If you are the organizer of a conference and you feel like I am representing your work unfairly, please get in touch and we can have a conversation about it, ok? My goal is just to share my own opinions. 

The Number One Problem: they won't do it if I don't grade it

Every school and district that I visit has the same number one problem: Students and other stakeholders (admin, caretakers) are focused on points not learning.

I get to travel around the country and beyond and talk about assessment in world language classes. I am so lucky. I have my dream job! In all of my day-long assessment workshops, I ask teachers to identify their number one grading problem from a brief list.  Their problem: students and other stakeholders are focused on points, not learning.

This is the Numbers = Learning mindset. Or Grades = Compensation. Or Compliance= Learning. 

Every. Single. School. This comes up a lot on various social media groups too. 

Now, I've already written at least one blog post where I talk about this (OK, actually this one and this one) but today, I want to address this issue head-on and in a very direct (and possibly blunt) way.  

Who's problem is it to solve? 

The first thing that we need to be clear on: it's OUR problem, and it's OUR problem to address. 

Other stakeholders have a role, of course, but we don't have much influence on them. But our own actions, assessment decisions, and words are (usually) under our own sphere of influence. So...

Teachers: This is OUR problem. 

What I observe is that although everyone is having the same issues, everyone seems to just shrug their shoulders and say "that's the way it is" and/or not try to do anything about it. As if it's one of those things, like gravity, or needing oxygen to survive: something immutable, unchangeable, and completely out of our control. 

It is just not true. 

As teachers, grades and grading are very much in our realm of influence. The way we approach grades and grading is under our control!  

Yes, of course we have guidelines, departmental expectations, etc. And yes, often those guidelines are absolutely bananas and completely unreasonable and one more thing in an absolutely maddening heap of unreasonable things that are asked of teachers.  

Within all of that: we are a significant part of the system that creates those guidelines and expectations.  We are the teachers who are trying to better ourselves and our practice, the thought-leaders, and the department heads. (I know this for a fact simply because you are reading this! You care enough to learn more.) 

Additionally, we have an awful lot of influence over our own classroom practice. We can influence the culture of grades and grading in our classrooms, and maybe (eventually, or depending on your role), in departments, schools, and districts. 

We can shift the culture of grades and grading in our own classroom.

One caveat: Assessment systems and expectations and beliefs are so incredibly varied across the US that it is unlikely that any one teacher will be able to follow all of my suggestions, and you might choose not to because you don't like them! However, I bet there are one or two things you CAN do that will make a difference. 

Honestly, if a Numbers = Learning mindset is your biggest problem with grades and grading, why wouldn't you try to change what you can? So let's get started. 

Solution #1: Make grades meaningful. 

There is a technical term: "hodgepodge grading". What this means is that everything is tossed into a grade book to make up a grade: tests, quizzes, in-class activities/worksheets, homework, behavior, projects, presentations, note taking, exit tickets, bell ringers, participation, preparedness, and a whole lot more. 

Don't believe me?  If you just google "Spanish 2 syllabus" or "French 1 syllabus", you will find a huge range of things that are included in grades.  

Aside from the massive equity issues in grading for accuracy, participation, preparedness, behavior/compliance, and homework, what do any of those tell us about what a student knows and can do in the target language? 

Wait, doesn't accuracy tell us what a student knows and can do? 

Well, yes, AND. 

The problem with accuracy: Accuracy is not even expected of Advanced-Low speakers of the language- that is, the minimum proficiency level for teachers (in most states).  Learners are supposed to show increasing accuracy as they move up the proficiency levels, but remember: errors in accuracy (e.g. gender agreement, subject verb agreement, conjugation, etc.) are not even marked on the AP exams. 

Read that again!

So how do we make grades meaningful? 

• Link performance descriptors to number or letter grades. Read more here: What goes in the gradebook (Deskless Classroom) and Grade for Proficiency (The Comprehensible Classroom)
• Stop giving extra credit. For anything. 
• "Assess what students know and can in the target language, and minimize or exclude everything else" - Martina Bex. 

Solution #2: Say this instead

Censor yourself. If at any point you find yourself saying "this will be graded" or "you better do this for the grade", stop, take a breath, and say this instead: "I can't wait to see what you can do."

If you answer questions like "is this graded?" or "how much is this worth?", stop, take a breath, and say this instead: "show me what you know." 

When you threaten students with grades ("this will be graded"), you are indicating that you don't care what the students know or can do, you just care about their numbers. The grades. The compensation. THE COMPLIANCE. Even if that is the furthest from the truth! Your words and actions are what students hear / see and make meaning from. 

Every time a student asks how much it is worth, they are calculating the benefit/cost of doing it, doing it well, or not doing it. They are treating grades as compensation. 

With enough consistency, most will slowly stop asking, and many will slowly start to see that their work is what's important. You can help them make this shift! 

Solution #3: Make every graded assignment worth the same number of points (including summative assessments).

In my class, that was 10 points. Everything was 10 points. Even tests. I simply programmed my grade book to figure out the weights of the categories (interpretive assessments, presentational assessments, "work"). 

"But they won't do it if I don't grade it". 

Grading everything and putting weight to everything is *not* the solution. If it was, why hasn't it worked yet?  

Additionally- is that true for every student? Probably not. 

Getting at the why- why won't they do it- takes more work, and more time- but grading more doesn't change the root problem. 

You can't control other people. But you can make change in your own classroom: your words, your policies, your practice. 

Want to read more about the intersections of assessment, equity, and actual solutions? I have written so much about assessment: here's everything on this blog.   I also write for The Comprehensible Classroom on Setting Standards, Performance vs. Proficiency, Finals and Midterms, and more! 

Listen up! New Podcast with Claudia Elliot!

My friend and collaborator (also vice-chair of the Comprehension-Based Communicative Language Teaching Special Interest Group (CCLT SIG) for ACTFL) Claudia Elliot, of the Growing With Proficiency podcast and training resources, kindly invited me to join her to talk about the things I didn't learn in methods classes (one of my favorite subjects!) and other topics of interest to world language teachers. 

https://growingwithproficiency.com/what-we-may-have-not-learned-in-our-method-class-about-second-language-acquisition-with-elicia-cardenas/

You can listen to it on all your favorite podcast streamers:

Apple:  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-80-what-we-may-have-not-learned-in-our-method/id1647436152?i=1000648329195

Spotify https://open.spotify.com/episode/2RVOaSLJ1fcsAOOppny3RQ

Caregiver -Teacher Conferences (Parent-Teacher Conferences)

 This is a post that I have had planned for YEARS but never actually wrote.  I was planning on writing it during the 4th week of March, 2020. And we all remember how that went down...

Here is the plan that I used for nearly every caregiver conference after I jumped into an acquisition-driven, comprehension-based framework (and started using Somos), and it made conferences more of a pleasure than a pain. *Usually.*

A quick word about my context: 

• Expected to be available to meet for 10 minutes with every student's caregivers, 2x a year, October and March.
• About 85% of families and caregivers chose to meet with me.
• *Not* student-led. In fact, caregivers were told that students were not welcome. 
• Middle school. 
• Our conferences were  *not* about grades. We were explicitly told to focus on other things- if grades came up we could address them but teachers were not supposed to bring up Little Johnny's grades and talk about them to use up our 10 minutes. 
• We had marathon sessions of conferences- like 4-5 hours straight, and they went until after my bedtime.  They were so exhausting that I had to figure out how to make them very formulaic so that I didn't make terrible mistakes. (Like that time I told a caregiver that the kiddo was doing great, no concerns, and she emailed me the next morning saying "then why does she have a D in your class?" That was just plain exhaustion.) 

Plan Ahead

Martina Bex and The Comprehensible Classroom created a couple of resources that became really important to me for conferences. I had to be very intentional and plan how to use them with students throughout the year to maximize their usefulness. Here's a brief plan, with links to the products and very detailed descriptions. 

Week 1, Beginning of the Year

• Assign a the Syllabus homework to students and caregivers
• Location: Available as a free download, Somos 1, Unit 1
• Pro tip: use different colored paper for different sections- easier to file later! 
• Collect and actually read them as they came back, and follow up as needed/make notes of information.
• File those very valuable pieces of paper in files with student names (or have them file them for me!). 

You might be wondering why I do this on actual paper? For one, I like paper. I like having something physical, and in order to share it for conferences, we need something physical. For another thing, it was more likely to get seen if it was an actual thing rather than a link. 

September, Beginning of the Year

• Follow up with any students/caregivers who didn't turn it in. I need this before Fall Conferences! 
• Bulletin Board prep:
• These are located in the hallway where caregivers wait, and are *very* valuable in sharing information passively with all school stakeholders!
• Proficiency Descriptions Bulletin board, created with students. Read about that and see some photos here: Teaching about Proficiency Levels
• Start to create the Reading Board to be ready by conferences.  (This is a post that is coming soon...once I find the pictures! You can get a sense of what they look like at the start of the "Classroom Video Tour" Fun Club Episode. starting at 9:56-11:30 or so.)   

 

October, Fall Conferences

For each scheduled conference, have:

• Interactive-ish notebook with any assessments /readings glued in
• (paper) file with any timed freewrites (for level 1B and up)
• (paper) syllabus homework from week 1, in paper file 

Note: I just put these in tubs that I bought at the dollar store, in order of the conference time because we had no time between meetings. We were scheduled minute by minute- like one conference would end at 10:10 and the next one would begin at 10:10. 

In my meeting place, have:

• 2-3 chairs of different sizes (so that different bodies and preferences felt welcomed!)
• Table
• My list of conferences/attendees
• Tub of student materials
• Copy of the syllabus with proficiency levels on them, for each level.
• Digital clock to keep us on time!

Flow of meeting

Each conference would go pretty much the same way (with variations, of course):

"Thank you, I'm Elicia, and I'm, happy to meet/see you again.

Since we have only have 10 minutes, I want to go over any questions and information you provided on the syllabus homework, show you a short sample of Little Johnny's work, and answer any other questions you have. What is Little Johnny saying about Spanish at home?"

I would listen, respond, and then:

• I would go over their version of the syllabus homework, 
• show them a work sample (usually from the interactive-ish notebook),
• share whether I had any concerns about them progressing or anything else, 
• Finally answer their questions.

Usually, their questions were some variation of "how can I help at home if I do not speak Spanish?" or "How can I help at home if I do speak Spanish?"  My answers were: 

• ask your student about Spanish class, 
• ask your student to read something from our Canvas page or their notebook and tell you about
• read something with them from one of those sources. 

November-December-January

As we do timed freewrites, have students file them in their portfolio whether they are graded or not. 

As we start our free voluntary reading program (FVR), have them keep track of their reading with sticky notes, and periodically, add to the sticky note graph on the Reading bulletin board. 

Mid February, prepping for Spring Conferences

Plan a day in my schedule for every class to do some reflections. This will take at least the full hour, so maybe do it on a day when they are all too tired (or I am!) to do anything else! 

Print out a reflection packet for every. single. kid. (Do this on the same colored paper as the syllabus homework! You will thank yourself later!) 

Reflection packet:

I used the two reflection forms from The Comprehensible Classroom and added another page to ask about their reading. 

• Student Self-reflections (2 pages)  Subscriber library /  Administrative Items: CC Subscriber Library / Student Self-reflection form
• Reading form: (to be added!) 

Students were asked to get their portfolio files and their interactive-ish notebooks, and fill out their reflection sheets. One was about their behavior and engagement, another was about what they were learning, what helped them learn, and most importantly, a piece of work that they were most proud of. 

They marked this with a sticky note in their notebooks or put it on the top of of their portfolio (so I didn't have to search in their file). They also had to explain why they chose this and how it demonstrates their increasing proficiency. 

I did stipulate that the work they picked was a graded assessment, so that I knew that I had seen it and graded it. If they *really* wanted something that I hadn't graded, I asked them why and if it was a good reason, I would assess it using the same rubric that I use for that type of work. They usually didn't need this option. I did this because some would pick some really silly activity that didn't showcase their learning, where the assessments were very much designed to show what they knew and could do in the target language, and assessed accordingly. 

This type of reflection was really, really, really hard for a good number of students and also for me. It took SO. MUCH. TIME. Some would write no-no-no-I haven't learned- nothing on every page. I had to be constantly circulating, keeping an eye on the ones who would try to do the minimum, cajoling, modeling what to write, doing brain breaks with them, practicing patience, and pointing out what I thought was amazing from their work. This was always a very trying day for me, but the payoff was 100% worth it. It was even worth giving up an entire class period to not doing something input focused.

When they were finished, I had them bring their file back with their reflections on top and their work sample clearly marked.  Some had to finish the next day. 

Spring Conferences

I had the same things as before:

• Tubs of portfolios and notebooks
• Chairs
• Table
• Digital Clock
• Syllabus for each level with proficiency descriptors. 

I started each conference in much of the same way, with this difference: 

"Thank you for coming and I'm happy to meet you/ see you again.

Since we have only have 10 minutes, I want to share with you some work that Little Johnny chose as the work they are most proud of in Spanish, share their reflection on their work so far, and answer any other questions you have."

From that, I let the students' words speak for themselves.

Celebrating Success

Here's the thing: most kids, when they are supported in being reflective, are incredibly aware of themselves. They know when they need improvement, and where, and they also know when they have done good work. 

It was so incredibly joyful to show caregivers what students CAN DO. Sometimes the kiddos picked two pieces of writing to compare and wrote about how much more they could write, or how they were really proud that they could correctly infer meaning from a reading quiz, etc. 

Instead of conferences being something to dread, they were (usually) little celebrations that left me feeling motivated and successful and caregivers feeling proud.  

Of course, I also had to have hard conversations and I had caregivers be mean and tell me that I was a terrible teacher, but that's part of of the job too. I had a LOT more positive interactions when I prepped for conferences this way, and I grew relationships with caregivers that was based on positives, which made any negative conversations easier overall. 

And the best one? When that one family apologized, years later, for being so unkind in prior conferences, saying that their older kiddo had learned more in my class than any other, and they were grateful to me. 

I hope that reading about how I set up conferences can give you some ideas for how to make these opportunities easier and positive. 

The New, Updated "Secret Input"

 I have totally been neglecting this little blog, but not because I haven't been working!

Take a look at the updated information and directions for Secret Input! This is a new blog post on The Comprehensible Classroom, by me. 

https://comprehensibleclassroom.com/blog/caption-this-activity-to-provide-secret-input

More soon! 

Input-Based Children's Books!

Hello everyone! My name is Caitlin McKinney, and I am really excited to be writing as a guest blogger for The Deskless Classroom.

About Me:

I teach 5 different levels of French in a public high school. I am one of six French teachers in my district and currently the only French teacher in my building. I am just wrapping up my ninth year teaching and have been teaching with Acquisition Driven Instruction (ADI) for 5 years. ADI to me refers to a collection of teaching strategies that uses comprehensible target language in an interesting, repetitive manner so that students acquire the language (rather than relying on memorization of vocabulary and grammar rules).

The Challenge: Ending the Year and Testing and Block Schedules

It’s the end of the year. What that means in my district is that we are in the middle of standardized testing season.

Instead of our typical 50 minute class periods, 5 days a week schedule, we are on a block schedule.

For those of you that teach on blocks, wow! It’s a challenge for me and my students. My students are not at all accustomed to listening to French for 105 minutes, so this is always a struggle, especially with my lower levels.

Past Plans for Block/Exams and the End of The Year

In the past I have used this time (or at least part of it) for a class project in which my students write, illustrate, and publish their own children’s books in the target language.

Note from Elicia: this book project thing is *not* a project that is aligned with acquisition driven instruction- that's my personal opinion (and it is my blog!). 

Rethinking, Reflecting

I was recently perusing The Deskless Classroom when I saw Elicia’s post about classroom projects. The whole time I was reading her analysis and critique, I was nodding my head.

• Was the task above my student’s proficiency level? Yes. 
• Was the project focusing more on output? Yes. 
• Did I spend a lot of time doing error corrections? Absolutely.

Even so, I was in desperate need of a class period where I could be hands off, and my students were in desperate need of a quiet creative outlet.

Then it struck me: Why not make an input-based project?

Input-based Children’s Books!

Instead of having my students write a children’s book, I would have them create a wordless picture book for their class and then USE THOSE BOOKS FOR INPUT.

Even my level ones could benefit from all of the great things that come with projects (e.g. an outlet for creativity, an opportunity for student input, and just plain novelty) in the classroom routine - without having to worry about their proficiency levels.  

Plus, I can break up our long class periods by using their wordless picture books for picture talk! 

To create the actual book, I plan to add words to the text as we created the story together using a Write and Discuss format (read more about that here: Write and Discuss). Since this is something we do regularly, it’s easy to incorporate.
Note: If you ever get a chance to see Caitlin present about Write and Discuss at a local or regional conference, you should! -Elicia

Translation: One day, Jimmy is sitting next to his dog and he thinks "I want to go to the park one day."
Here is an example of one page from a level 1 student after I went through the write and discuss / picture talk process. I loved that I could add dialogue for another repetition of first person perspective! 

By the end of class, the book *should* be ready for printing.

And the best part? I don’t have to sit down and edit it, because as we are co-creating the text and I am writing it up, I’m editing in the moment! 

There is no extra step of editing student work!

Oh, the other best part, and the thing that’s most relevant to this blog, is that students are getting input, that they understand, about something that is super interesting and engaging to them: their wordless books and their friend's wordless books. 

Afterwards, I can simply send the fully illustrated, co-created story to the printer and add it to my library the next day.

What do you need?

• Educator’s Account in Canva- FREE
• Time  (60 minutes or more) for students to create wordless books
• Time to conference with students as they are working to create their wordless book
• Time to picture talk and add text (after they are created)

I decided to upgrade my Canva account to an educator’s account for free. (Click for more information on getting a free Canva educator's account.) This allows both myself and all my students access to all the educator features in Canva, which means that students have a lot of images and graphics to use!

Canva allows teachers to create an assignment and assign it to a class, so I used that function and created a blank assignment using a storybook template.

We use a Learning Management System (LMS) like GoogleClassroom so I posted the link there for students to join the Canva environment.

Guidance for Students

On our first day, students joined my class in Canva. 

After that, I really didn’t give them a whole lot of guidance. I simply said, you need to create a title page with a French title (this was the only language requirement) along with 10-20 illustrated pages that tell a complete story. The story is required to have a clear beginning, middle, and end. Students had about an hour to make their books and submit them. As they turned them in, I was able to conference with them and make suggestions about how to make their stories more clear. I also took this opportunity to preview the stories and make sure they were appropriate and didn’t rely on stereotypes or offensive plots.  Keep reading to learn about how I figured out that I needed *more* and *more specific* guidance for my students. 

Requirements for the Wordless Books

• Title Page with a title in the Target Language.
• 10-20 illustrated pages.
• No words (other than the title) 
• The story has to have a clear beginning, middle, and end, and tell a complete story.
• It must be submitted by the end of one block period. 

Creating the Text

The next day in class proceeded as normal. After doing some of what I had already planned, curriculum-wise, I displayed one student’s story on the board. 

We talked about what we saw and how the characters were feeling, and eventually a story emerged.

I wrote the text of the story that we came up with in the target language, making sure that all students were understanding. 

Note: For a great primer on the skills that Caitlin used, take a look at this blog post: How to teach such that they understand, by Martina Bex -Elicia

What was really cool is that several books already had blank speech bubbles in the illustrations. This provided the perfect opportunity for scaffolded partner speaking opportunities and collaboration

Translation: There is a dog who is named Todd. He wants to shoot the ball. Even the simplest designs can be a source of rich input for storytelling. This is an example of one of my students who doesn't love artistic pursuits. He made a minimalist illustrated book, and after a little bit of coaching on how to tell a complete story through illustrations, we were able to write a great story in class. 

I simply had students turn to a shoulder partner and give suggestions for what the characters could be saying in French, and then we chose the best/most interesting/funniest options and I added them to the text.

The results

The process has been going very well. The student buy-in is great and my classes are excited to share their creativity and humor!

The Reflection and Lessons Learned

I am learning some lessons along the way.  First, I need to be more clear in my instructions about avoiding stereotypes. I had a few students who were required to start over but thankfully I had that class time to review them before sharing them on the screen.

This next section is more-or-less a transcript of Caitlin and me (Elicia) talking through these messy topics because a) it made more sense to make it a dialogue, b) it was a really interesting discussion and one that is SUPER relevant to teaching and moving towards equity in our classrooms, and I am so thankful to Caitlin for engaging in this type of deep reflection and making her thinking public. T/W: Discussion of violence, guns, fatphobia, and gun violence. 

Elicia: 

Caitlin, can you tell me more about these stereotypes? What did students do that you had to redirect? 

Caitlin: 

Violence. I realized that I needed to do some self-reflection about how much violence I was comfortable with seeing in my class stories.

Storytelling with high school students can often lead to endings that are violent. For example, all the characters die or solve conflicts with violence.

Elicia: 

In middle school too!

Caitlin: 

I allow a certain degree of this in my class, but what I realized-when I was seeing these fully illustrated texts- is that my comfort level with violence changed slightly when presented with images.

While I might say “he attacked the monster” during storytelling, seeing one character shoot another with a gun in an illustrated text elicited some different emotions for myself.

Elicia:

Oh wow. Yeah. I have to say that for me, as a survivor of a school shooting, that would freak me out. My students all knew that guns were only to be discussed in context in my classroom (and pretty much that never came up) and never included in stories, but I imagine other teachers may not be so…specific! 

Translation: Now the mean bully can no longer bully others.
This was a book illustrated by a level 2 student about a school bully. This is about the level of violence I allow them to include. It is not uncommon for characters to die in their stories, but I carefully consider how much violence is acceptable, and then I communicate those expectations. 

Caitlin: 

So in the middle of the project, I asked students to avoid using firearms and come up with a weapon that was more school friendly, such as enraged unicorns, poisonous marshmallows, or an army of piranhas. I would probably have even more stringent guidelines about violence if I taught younger children.

Elicia: 

I love these examples! In my classroom, I started every year with “the world is a pretty dreadful place sometimes, so in this room, we are going to celebrate puppies, rainbows, unicorns, and glitter. While bad things do happen and are real, when we are telling stories and creating in this classroom, it’s going to be all puppies and rainbows.” 

It seemed to work for my context and students tended to respect that- and would even remind each other by saying “puppies and rainbows” if they felt like a suggestion was too violent.

And..sometimes I would let them end a story with someone eating someone else…as a surprise.

So other than violence, what else did you see that made you step back?

Caitlin: 

Well, one student made a story with an overweight character who was sad and had to lose weight in order to find a girlfriend who loved him because he was beautiful.

To be honest, the story just didn’t sit right with me, and I had a hard time communicating this to my student. What I ended up saying was that sometimes it is hard to balance humor and honoring the dignity of other people. I felt like his story leveraged a negative image of his character in order to get his readers to laugh, but there were more positive ways to be funny.

Elicia: 

Yikes! That’s a tough one. This is a great example of a stereotype that flies under the radar and is still socially acceptable, and it’s rooted in white supremacy and fear of the fat body.

Caitlin: 

Yes, in the moment it was hard for me to find the right words. In the end he chose not to change his story, and I felt a degree of helplessness, like I didn’t have leverage. So I simply didn’t use his story for my classroom library or as the text for our write and discuss as a class. I certainly didn’t want to give that kind of thinking a stage in my classroom, but I wish I would have handled it more directly.

Elicia: 

I really appreciate that you found a way to communicate this without shaming your student for his fatphobia. Talking about this stuff is really hard- especially if it is something that is personal- which it really is for me!

I think I would likely have made a different choice because I feel so strongly about this. And because I feel so strongly about it, I might have damaged my relationship with that kid because of my own emotional reaction, which is really interesting for me to think about. Would my own feelings have gotten in the way of helping that kid see their bias? Should they have? Hmmm…I need to think about that.

Was there anything else?

Caitlin: 

Yes. I had to give very clear expectations for the co-created story telling in class. Students had MANY opinions and reactions when they saw each other’s stories for the first time. Occasionally the laughter and side conversations took away from the input. For example, when the images were really outrageous or unexpected, there was an explosion of commentary. So much so, that I felt like students were no longer engaged with the language. I was getting frustrated (as many of us are at this time of year!). 

What ended up working was this: I had to give a 5 second countdown for giggling before we could refocus. This solved the issues in most of my classes.

Elicia: 

OMG I love this so much. The structured giggles and commentary break! When I taught 5th grade and had to teach health/intro to being a teenager, I had to do the same thing!

Translation: Now they are no longer afraid of Bart. Everyone hugs. Bart finally has a lot of friends. 
Sometimes students DO write a story with a happy ending! 

Back to Caitlin:

My favorite thing about this process was that after each story, we applauded the author and thanked them for their work. Every single one of my students was able to share something no matter their proficiency level, and I had so many great comprehensible texts to add to my classroom library.

During each class period, I had students begging for their story to be the next one. The only downside is that the school year might run out before we can experience everyone's masterpieces! Fortunately, I will have many of these students in class next year, so I can continue this process at the beginning of the next level for a review. For next year, however, I might want to move faster or start earlier if time allows.

Supporting the New-to-Language Kids: Differentiation in Action

Something that comes up a lot for teachers who have been using an acquisition driven, comprehension based approach is this: what do I do when I have a student who has little to no language in a class of students who have had a year or more of comprehension-based instruction, and have a lot of language under their belts?

We have to accommodate them.

Now, I want to be clear: accommodating them is my job. It’s hard. And to some degree, a little unfair for them- I mean, who wants to be the person with a kindergarten reading level in a 6th grade class? (Which is a close equivalent.)

As a teacher, it’s reasonable to differentiate about 3 sub-levels; like Novice Mid, Novice High, Intermediate Low.

It is a big ask to do 4 or more levels in one class. And in 2022-23, it's totally normal.
So in this sub job that I went to in Fall of 2022, students were put in language class without regard to their level. They were just lumped in.

Which meant that students with 0 language were put in a class with students who had at least a year (or more if they were in 8th grade!) of solid comprehension based instruction. And just to add some more challenge, I wasn't told which of the students were completely new.

It was REALLY hard! For them and for me. 

However, there are some things that I did that are a) good practice, and b) allowed them to successfully read an ENTIRE page of text at the end of our time together. And frankly, I’m really proud of these interventions. 

So what did I do? What were my teacher moves and strategies? How did I think ahead to start to address this situation? 

WHOLE CLASS: Establishing Meaning

What this means is that I told kids what words meant. This looked mostly like me putting the most important words on the board in the target language and in our shared language.
Was it possible to put every word I was going to use on the board? No.
It was possible for me to put the most important words up, and with the support of the question words, cognates, and adding words as needed, I was able to keep our conversations pretty “sheltered”.

But wait! What about the recommendation from ACTFL that says that 90% of the language in class should be in the target language? By telling kids what things mean, aren't I depriving them of "productive struggle"? 

First, ACTFL's recommendation is just that: a recommendation. It's not the law. There are no ACTFL police that are going to come around and fine me. 

While it is absolutely true that I want my students to be hearing (and reading, and interacting in) the target language a whole lot, if I am just speaking in the target language and they are not understanding, they aren't going to acquire anything. And frankly, using a shared language to link meaning is the simplest, most efficient way to make sure that students are able to comprehend the target language. Efficiency is important when we have limited hours of contact. You can read more of my opinion about this here: 90% Target Language.

"Productive struggle" is one thinly veiled way to make sure that some kids succeed and some don't. It's also a concept from traditional education contexts that just doesn't apply in a language classroom. If the goal is for students to acquire language, intentionally making things difficult for them to understand (or making it such that only a select few, or a certain kind of learner can understand) is both elitist and a waste of time. It also leads to the belief that only certain people are good at learning languages, minimal enrollment in upper level classes, and eventually, program closure.   

WHOLE CLASS: Sheltering Vocabulary

When I say “sheltering”, I am referring to the skill of “shelter vocabulary, not grammar.” I was focused on sheltering vocabulary- or as Martina Bex puts it: “protecting students from the words they don’t know and the negative emotions that come from not knowing them.” (And for what it’s worth, this is one of the most challenging skills for a teacher to develop.)
I planned ahead as much as possible and pre-wrote words and their meaning on the board as well - which in turn helped me remember what words to use- it helped me shelter better. It meant that I had a reminder in front of me about which words to use (and if it wasn't on the board, I should really try to not use it!)

WHOLE CLASS: Pause, Point, Slow

I worked really, really hard to speak slowly and point to the meaning of words as I said them. Of course, they had to be looking at where I was pointing, and paying attention to the English meaning. That was tough- but I'll deal with that in a minute.

WHOLE CLASS: Glossing everything

Glossing means adding the meaning of words- like a glossary. If I gave the students a reading, I put the core vocabulary on the top with meaning, and other words that I would not expect them to know as footnotes.

Reminders to myself

I had to constantly remind myself: I can not assume that they know anything. I certainly can not assume that they remember anything because I have no idea who was in class before. So thinking that they "should" know a word or meaning is just not fair. As John Bracey, a colleague and amazing Latin teacher reminds us: there are no "shoulds" in class.

This is such an important thing to remember- and one that I feel so deeply as I sit in my Chinese class and ask about the meaning of the same word...every. single. week. (OK, I ask for one word like 3 weeks in a row, then I ask about a new one.) If my teacher made me feel ashamed for asking, I'd never show up again. 

What it looked like:

Here's an example: I knew that we were going to be doing a ClipChat about a man, on a sofa, who opens and closes the door. On the board, I put up every word that I thought would be unknown- mostly it was verbs (opens, closes, walks, runs, there is, etc.). I tried to do this ahead of each class- this is why I love having a lot of whiteboard space.

Here's a picture of my white board:

Image of a whiteboard with Spanish words, underlined, and English meaning written in blue

For another story, using the EXACT same vocabulary, I made sure that all the words were on the board and on the copy of the text that they were going to read.

We did a gallery walk style reading, where they had to decide who said what based on the reading. Again, all the words were on the board. 

This is differentiation

I want to be clear: making sure that everyone is able to understand is differentiation. It is so easy to teach to the top tier of student- the motivated, the ones with tons of language, the ones that are engaged because they love it. But our job is to teach all the students, and this is the first step: making sure all students understand the target language input.

The Results

Was it perfect? Nope. Not at all. I was imperfect because I am not a mind reader, and I had no idea what they did and didn’t know, and who knew what, and so on. I was imperfect because it’s been since last May that I was in a classroom. I was imperfect because I am human!

It was messy too- because the students who had no prior language experience really struggled with believing that they could understand. They didn’t believe that I was pointing to the meaning of the words as I used them, and they didn’t believe that they were going to succeed. They arrived tuned out, turned off, and disconnected. 

And slowly, they started to come around. The magic really began to happen in 7th grade, when I started using an early unit from Somos. The thing about Somos is that it is structured in such a way that students get a lot of repeated exposure to the same vocabulary and it is written so that it is very easy to shelter vocabulary for the teacher. (Read about my relationship with Somos here.) 

The students really responded to the structure of the unit plan, but more importantly, we were keeping the language really focused on just a few key terms. 

INDEPENDENT WORK: Individual interventions and Small Groups

Any time I had students doing independent or partner work (reading a story, responding to questions about that story, etc.), I tried to either modify the task for the newer students or pulled them in a small group to work with them separately, or both. (Of course, it took a few days for me to figure out who was brand new.)

Sometimes this looked like having them just read the first paragraph with me and translating it. Or just reading highlighted sentences (that I highlighted as they sat down to work- no prep.) Another option was to not answer all the comprehension questions, or not complete the entire task. Remember: all students need not be doing the exact same thing. This is differentiation!

I also had them working together in a homogenous (same level) group so I could work with them and the other students could work independently. 

In 8th grade, I had one student new to language, and she sat with me and read some stories from the very first units of Somos (that I happened to have from previous classes). She translated them or drew them while everyone else was working on a more appropriately leveled activity. 

When we did Quick Draw, a partner activity that I did want her to participate in, I had already created two versions of a text (one in present tense, one in past tense). I put her in a homogenous group and modified the task: I invited that group to play with just 5 of the 10 sentences from the present tense, familiar version. (Read more about quick draw, from AnneMarie Chase, here.)

In another class, I had my 7th graders do a fun variation on a volleyball reading: one I first saw demonstrated by Craig Sheehy of TPRS Books. Note: this was a text that they had listened and read along with me already- it was familiar. 

In this activity, I arranged chairs to be in the formation of a small airplane, 2 by 2. Students were seated with a partner and had to do a volleyball reading: one person read the target language sentence, then the other translated it, and then read the next target language sentence. Then the first partner translated that one. Read more about volleyball translation here from The Comprehensible Classroom (Martina Bex). 

The twist is this: I put up a map of different countries, put on my best flight attendant voice, and every few minutes, announced that we would be landing in a different destination, and the first 2 or 3 people in first class (either on the left or right) had to move to economy. Everyone else moved up. I alternated what side of the "plane" had to move so students would get different partners. They had to go back to the earliest part of the text of either partner, even if one of them had already read that section. 

Image: students sit with their backs to the camera in rows of 2, reading out loud

SUCCESS: Two out of the 3 new-to-Spanish students were able to read and translate the ENTIRE page with their partners.

Note: Only 2 of the 3 did it. I had not managed to convince the 3rd kiddo that I was there to help them succeed. But that’s not too bad for 3 (shortened) weeks of instruction! 

What would I do next?

In practical terms, moving forward, I would plan on giving the new students nearly the same assessments, but I would discuss a few different options for reporting their assessments with them and their caregivers.

One option would be that they would take the assessment but I would not report their scores for the first trimester or 2. Since my grades are standards-based, this is something that has worked for me before, with admin and caregiver approval. 

I hope this helps you get some ideas about what to do with different levels, new students, etc.!